期刊文献+

我国高校科研合作网络的构建与特征分析--基于“211”高校的数据 被引量:32

Analysis of Construction and Characteristics of Scientific Collaboration Network of Universities——Based on the Data of“211”Universities
原文传递
导出
摘要 [目的/意义]我国地域辽阔、高校众多,了解不同高校之间的科学合作现状,对于推进"2011计划"有着重要意义。以SCI和SSCI数据库中的全体数据作为数据来源,针对传统科学计量学方法和现有软件无法处理海量数据的问题,开发出全新的数据处理方法,用于实现对不同机构之间的论文合作分析。[方法/过程]以我国111所"211"高校作为研究对象,对主要研究型大学之间以SCI和SSCI论文为代表的高水平论文合作情况进行定量研究,计算各高校在论文合作网络中的中介中心性并排序,进而绘制合作网络图谱。[结果/结论]我国高校科研论文合作的现状与全貌是科研实力较强的"985"综合性高校排序靠前,而学科专业性较强、地理位置偏僻的高校排序靠后;我国目前的大学科学论文合作整体存在以地理聚类为主、学科聚类为辅的合作关系特征。这一特征为科研管理和教育管理工作提供了启示,即:既要发挥"985"高校的领军作用,也要发挥区域中优势高校的增长极作用,在"2011计划"的学科框架下实现广泛交流。 [ Purpose/significance ] There are vast territories and numerous universities in China. It has important sig- nificance to understand the scientific cooperation among universities to promote the "2011 project". Based on all the data of SCI and SSCI database, this paper develops a new method of process data to solve the problem that in the traditional scientific metrology and the existing software can' t deal with the huge amounts of data. This method is used to analyze the cooperation among different institutions. [ Method/process ] Taking all the "211" universities as the research object, this paper calculates, ranks and maps the cooperation network by quantitative research of SCI and SSCI high level papers col- laboration of these universities. [ Result/condusion] By using social network analysis to analyze the position of universi- ties in the thesis cooperation network from the macroscopic angle, this paper summarizes the present situation of the major universities in China: the "985" comprehensive universities have strong research capabilities rank higher while the remote universities which has strong disciplines rank lower; geographical proximity is the main elements, while disciplinary prox- imity secondary in the universities' collaboration. The characteristic provide the revelation to scientific and education management: "985"universities should play the leading role while the universities which have the regional advantage play the growth pole role; communicate widely under the "2011 project" framework of discipline.
出处 《图书情报工作》 CSSCI 北大核心 2015年第2期82-88,共7页 Library and Information Service
基金 2011年度全国教育科学规划教育部青年项目“基于知识图谱的国际高等教育研究前沿及其演进分析”(项目编号:EIA110369)研究成果之一
关键词 科学论文合作网络“211”高校Web of SCIENCE scientific papers collaborative networks "211" universities Web of Science
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1Han Pu,Shi Jin,Li Xiaoyan, et al. International collaboration in[J]. Scientometrics, 2014,98(1): 53 -72.
  • 2Wang Xianwen,Xu Shenmeng,Wang Zhi,et al. International sci-entific collaboration of China : Collaborating countries, institutionsand individuals[ J]. Scientometrics, 2013 , 95(3) : 885 - 894.
  • 3He Tianwei. International scientific collaboration of China with theG7 countries[ J]. Scientometrics, 2009, 80(3) : 571 -582.
  • 4Narin F, Stevens K, Whitlow E. Scientific cooperation in Europe-and the citation of multidomestically authored papers [ J ], Sciento-metrics,1991, 21(3) :313 -323.
  • 5Lancho Barrantes B S, Bote G, Vicente P, et al. Citation flows inthe zones of influence of scientific collaborations[ J]. Journal of theAmerican Society for Information Science and Technology, 2012,63(3) : 481 -489.
  • 6Franceschet M. Collaboration in computer science : A network sci-ence approach [J] . Journal of the American Society for InformationScience and Technology, 2011, 62(10): 1992 -2012.
  • 7Bomer K, Penumarthy S, Meiss M,et al. Mapping the diffusion ofscholarly knowledge among major US research institutions [ J ]. Sci-entometrics ,2006, 68(3) : 415 -426.
  • 8王贤文,丁堃,朱晓宇.中国主要科研机构的科学合作网络分析——基于Web of Science的研究[J].科学学研究,2010,28(12):1806-1812. 被引量:42
  • 9Kretschmer H. Author productivity and geodesic distance in biblio-graphic co - authorship networks, and visibility on the Web[ J].Scientometrics, 2004, 60(3) : 409 -420.
  • 10Newman M E J. Who is the best connected scientist. A study ofscientific coauthorship networks [ M ]//BenNaim E,FrauenfelderH, Toroczkai. Z Complex Networks. Berlin:Springer Berlin Heidel-berg, 2004 : 337 -370.

二级参考文献35

  • 1梁立明,张琳,韩强.欧盟15国科学合作的地域倾向和语言倾向[J].自然辩证法通讯,2006,28(5):60-67. 被引量:15
  • 2侯海燕.科学知识图谱:最有影响的50位科学计量学家[J].科学学研究,2007,25(3):404-406. 被引量:36
  • 3Katz, J.S., Martin, B.R. What is research collaboration? [J]. Research Policy, 1997(26): 1-18.
  • 4Presser, S. Collaboration and the quality of research [J].Social studies of science, 1980(10): 95-101.
  • 5Liang, L. M., Guo, Y. Z., Davis, M. Collaborative patterns and age structures in Chinese publications[J]. Scientometrics, 2001(54): 473-489.
  • 6Liming, Lang., Zhu, L. Major factors affecting China's inter-regional research collaboration: Regional scientific productivity and geographical proximity[J].Scientometrics,2002(55): 287-316.
  • 7Katz, J.S. Geographical proximity and scientific collaboration [J].Scientometrics, 1994(31 ): 31-43.
  • 8尹丽春,姜春林,殷福亮,王友强.基于CSCD和SCI的跨省区科学合作网络可视化分析[J].图书情报工作,2007,51(8):62-64. 被引量:33
  • 9马伊里.合作困境的组织社会学分析.上海:上海人民出版社,2008.
  • 10Barry B, Corley E. Scientists' collaboration strategies : Implications for scientific and technical human capital. Research Policy, 2004, 33(4) :599 -616.

共引文献171

同被引文献453

引证文献32

二级引证文献243

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部