期刊文献+

对我国新婚姻法限制男方离婚诉权之质疑——建议删除婚姻法第34条 被引量:1

A doubt on the limitation by China new law of marriage on the husband side's right of lawsuit for divorce——A suggestion on eliminating the 34th term from China new law of marriage
原文传递
导出
摘要 在妇女怀孕期间、分娩后一年内和中止妊娠后六个月内限制男方离婚诉权不利于对女方、男方、子女权益和社会整体利益的保护 ,也违背了婚姻法自身体系的一致性 ,其实施效果也极差。它是计划经济体制下漠视诉权、固守传统婚恋观念、厌讼观念的产物。婚姻法第 34条应废除。 The limitation on the husband side's right of lawsuit for divorce in wife's pregnancy, one year's term after parturition, or six months after gestation stopping is not only unhelpful to the protection of the interests of wife side, husband side, and even their children, but also violated to the systematic unity of the marriage law itself. Its practical effect too is unsatisactory in a great degree. It is the outcomes resulting from neglecting the rights of lawsuit, adhering to the traditional marry concepts, and abhorring any lawsuit of marriage in the planned system of economy. The 34the term should be eliminated from the new marriage.
作者 张加文
出处 《中国青年政治学院学报》 CSSCI 2002年第3期129-132,共4页 Journal of China Youth College for Political Sciences
关键词 婚姻法 离婚 诉权 婚姻 第34条 男方 合法权益 new law of marriage divorce rights of lawsuit marriage
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献5

  • 1谢晖.独立的司法与可诉的法[J].法律科学(西北政法大学学报),1999,21(1):22-29. 被引量:79
  • 2.《马克思恩格斯全集》第1卷[M].人民出版社,1956年.第459页.
  • 3.《邓小平文选》第2卷[M].人民出版社,1994年版.第163、362、236、250、312、313、312页.
  • 4Black's Law Dictionary:P26.1979 By West Publishing Company.
  • 5顾培东等.《经济诉讼的理论与实务》.四川人民出版社1988年版,第15页.

共引文献56

同被引文献7

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部