期刊文献+

地佐辛与芬太尼用于神经外科患者术后自控静脉镇痛的比较 被引量:3

Comparison of the analgesic effects of dezocine or fentany for intravenous patient'——controlled analgesia of military sursery
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的观察地佐辛与芬太尼用于神经外科患者术后自控静脉镇痛的效果及不良反应。方法 80名行神经外科手术的患者被随机分成芬太尼镇痛组(Ⅰ组,n=40)和地佐辛镇痛组(Ⅱ组,n=40)。Ⅰ组PCIA采用芬太尼16μg/kg、雷莫司琼0.6mg;Ⅱ组PCIA采用地佐辛0.8mg/kg、雷莫司琼0.6mg。观察并记录两组患者使用PCIA后2、6、12、24、48小时镇痛、镇静效果及不良反应情况。结果两组患者镇痛镇静效果无统计学差异(P>0.05),不良反应发生率差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论 0.8mg/kg的地佐辛可以安全有效的应用于神经外科患者术后自控静脉镇痛。 Objective To observe the analgesic effects and adverse reactions of dezocine or fentanyl for patient--controlled intravenous analgesia(PCIA) of military sursery. Methods 80 patients of military surgery under general anesthesia were randomly divided into fentanyl group(group I , n = 40)and dezocine group( group II ,n = 40). The PCIA solution contained fentanyl 16ug/kg and ramosetron 0. 6mg in group I while dezocine 0. 8mg/kg a and ramosetron 0. 6mg in group II. Results There were no significantly different on the analgesic effects ( P 〉 0.05 ) and significantly different on the adverse reactions ( P 〈 0. 05 ). Conclusion Dezocine 0. 8mg/kg can be safe and effective application in neurosurgery patients with PCIA.
出处 《中国老年保健医学》 2014年第1期32-33,共2页 Chinese Journal of Geriatric Care
关键词 地佐辛 芬太尼 神经外科 术后自控静脉镇痛 Dezocine, Fentanyl, Military sursery, PCIA
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献35

  • 1王雷,李树人.罗比卡因复合不同浓度芬太尼用于产科术后镇痛的临床观察[J].临床麻醉学杂志,2006,22(6):451-452. 被引量:30
  • 2Fischer BD, Dykstra LA. Interactions between an N-methly-D-asparte antagonist and low-efficacy opioid receptor agonists in assays of schedule-controlled responding and thermal rtociception [ J ]. J Pharmacol Exp Ther,2006,318 : 1300-1306.
  • 3Matia C, Coluzzi F, Sarzi Puttini P, et al. Paracetamol/Tramadol association:the easy solution for mild-moderate pain [ J ]. Minerva Med, 2008,99:369-390.
  • 4Wermeling DP, Foster TS, Farrington EA, et al. Patient-controlled analgesia using butorphanol for postoperative pain relief: An open-label study[ J ]. Acute Care ,2004,12 Suppl 1:31-39.
  • 5Fischer BD, Miller LL, Henry FE, et al. Increased efficacy of mu-opioid agonist-induced antinociception by metabotropic glutamate receptor antagonists in C57BL/6 mice: comparison with (-)-6-phosphonomethyldeca-hydroisoquinoline-3-carboxylic acid [ J ]. Psychopharmacology, 2008,198(2) :271-278.
  • 6Mall JL, Rosenthale ME, Gluckman MI. Animal pharmacology of Wy-16225, a new Analgesic agent [ J ]. J Phamaco Exper Ther, 2001,194 : 488-498.
  • 7Picker MJ. Discriminative stimulus effects of the mixed-opioid agonist/ antagonist dezocine: cross-substitution by mu and delta opioid agonists [ J]. J Pharmaco Exper Ther,2007,283 : 1009-1017.
  • 8Fischer BD, Miller LL, Henry FE, et al. Increased efficacy of microopioid agonist-induced antinociception by metabotropic glutamate receptor antagonists in C57BL/6 mice: comparison with(-)-6-phosphonomethyl-deca-hydrois oquinoline-3-carboxylic acid ( LY235959 )[J]. Psychopharmacology ( Berl), 2008,198 ( 2 ) : 271-278.
  • 9Vera SS, George H, Benjamin R. Comparison of intravneously administered dezocine and morphine for postoperative pain [ J ]. The Clinical Journal of Pain, 1987,2 (4) :239-244.
  • 10Finucane BT, Floyd JB, Petro DJ. Postoperative pain relief: a doubleblind comparison of dezocine, butorphanol, and placebo [ J ]. South Med J, 1986,79 (5) :548-552.

共引文献725

同被引文献22

引证文献3

二级引证文献11

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部