期刊文献+

老年患者腹腔镜结直肠癌根治术近期疗效分析 被引量:10

The recent curative effect analysis of the elderly patients with laparoscopic colorectal cancer resection
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的评价老年患者腹腔镜结直肠癌手术的住院时间与近期并发症。方法检索2000年至2013年国内外临床中心公开发表的结直肠癌腹腔镜与开腹根治术近期并发症的非随机对照研究(Non-randomized comparative studies,NRCs)文献,提取相关指标后综合分析。结果腹腔镜与开腹治疗的患者基本特征均衡。尿路感染发生率、吻合口瘘发生率与开腹组相比,差异无统计学意义(P=0.79、P=0.31)。切口感染、肺部感染、肠梗阻、心血管疾病及术后住院时间与开腹组根治术相比,差异存在统计学意义。腹腔镜组中术后近期总并发症发生率小于开腹组,差异存在统计学意义(P<0.01)。结论非随机对照研究资料研究显示,老年患者腹腔镜结直肠癌根治具有术后近期并发症发生率低、住院时间短的优势,可以考虑作为老年患者结直肠癌根治术的首选方法。 Objective To evaluate the length of hospital stay and recent complications of laparoseopic surgery (LS) and open surgery (OS) for colorectal cancer. Methods Non-randomized controlled trials (NRCs) reports on LS and OS for coloreetal cancer published from 2000 to 2013 both home and abroad were retrieved and relevant clinical effect indexes extracted for meta-analysis. Results The basic characteristics of patients in laparoscopic resection group were similar to those in open surgery group. There was no statistically significant difference on the incidence of urinary tract infection and the incidence of anastomotic fistula compared with OS (P = 0.79, P = 0.31). There was statistically significant difference, compared with OS, incision infection, lung infection, intestinal obstruction, and cardiovascular disease and postoperative length of hospital stay. LS in the near future total complication rate was less than OS, difference has statistical significance (P 〈 0.01). Conclusion NRCs studies suggested that LS had the advantage of low incidence of complications, shorter hospitalization time, and can be considered as a surgical method of choice for elderly patients,
出处 《中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版)》 2013年第6期25-28,共4页 Chinese Journal of Laparoscopic Surgery(Electronic Edition)
关键词 结直肠肿瘤 腹腔镜检查 结直肠外科手术 meta分析 Colon Cancer Rectum Cancer Laparoscopic Meta-analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

  • 1Turrentine FE, Wang H, Simpson VB, et al. Surgical risk factors,morbidity, and mortality in elderly patients. J Am Coil Surg, 2006, 203 (6) : 865-877.
  • 2Frasson M, Braga M, Vignali A, et al. Benefits of laparoscopic colorectal resection are more pronounced in elderly patients. Dis Colon Rectum, 2008, 51 (3): 296-300.
  • 3Delgado S, Lacy AM, Garcf a Valdecasas JC, et al. Could age be an indication for laparoscopic colectomy in colorectal cancer?.. SurgEndosc, 2000, 14(1) : 22-26.
  • 4Jeong DH, Hur H, Min BS, et al. Safety and feasibility of a laparoscopic colorectal cancer resection in elderly patients. Ann Coloproctol, 2013, 29(1): 22-27.
  • 5Vincenzo Bottino, Maria Grazia Esposito, Arianna Mottola, et al. Early outcomes of colon laparoscopic resection in the elderly patients compared with the younger. BMC Surg, 2012, 12 Suppl 1:$8.
  • 6Robinson CN, Balentine C J, Marshall CL, et al. Minimally invasive surgery improves short-term outcomes in elderly colorectal cancerpatients. J Surg Res, 2011, 166(2) : 182-188.
  • 7冯波,郑民华,毛志海,李健文,陆爱国,王明亮,胡伟国,董峰,臧潞,马君俊,蒋渝.70岁以上老年人腹腔镜结直肠癌手术的安全性[J].中华老年医学杂志,2006,25(2):113-116. 被引量:16
  • 8王亚楠,余江,张策,胡彦锋,程侠,李国新.高龄患者腹腔镜结直肠切除术安全性的研究[J].腹腔镜外科杂志,2009,14(10):732-735. 被引量:3
  • 9Senagore AJ, Madbouly KM, Fazio VW, et al. Advantages of laparoscopic colectomy in older patients. Arch Surg, 2003, 138 (3) : 252-256.
  • 10Frasson M, Braga M, Vignali A, et al. Benefits of laparoscopic colorectal resection are more pronounced in elderly patients. Dis Colon Rectum, 2008, 51 (3):296-300.

二级参考文献33

  • 1Turrentine FE, Wang H, Simpson VB, et al. Surgical risk factors, morbidity, and mortality in elderly patients [J]. J Am Coll Surg, 2006,203 ( 6 ) : 865 -877.
  • 2Alves A, Panis Y, Malhieu P, et al. Postoperative mortality and morbidity in French patients undergoing colorectal surgery : the results of a prospective multicenter study[J]. Arch Surg,2005,140 ( 3 ) : 278-283.
  • 3Alves A,Panis Y, Mantion G, et al. The "AFC-score'; validation of a four-item predicting score of postoperative mortality after colorectal resection for cancer or diverticulitis:Results of a prospective multicenter study in 1049 patients[ J ]. Ann Surg,2007, 246( 1 ) :91-96.
  • 4Liang JT, Shich M J, Chen CN, et al. Prospective evaluation of laparoscopy-assisted colectomy versus laparotomy with resection for management of complex polyps of the sigmoid colon [J]. World J Surg,2002,26 (3) :377-383.
  • 5Braga M, Vignali A, Gianotti L, et al. Laparoscopic versus open colorectal surgery. A randomized trial on short-term outcome [J]. Ann Surg,2002,236 (6) :759-767.
  • 6Abraham NS, Young JM, Solomon MJ. Meta-analysis of short-term outcomes after laparoscopic resection for colorectal cancer[J].Br J Surg,2004,91 (9) :1111-1124.
  • 7Leung KL, Kwok SP, I.am SC, et al. Laparoscopic resection of rectosigmoid carcinoma : prospective randomised trial [J]. Lancet, 2004,363(9416) :1187-1192.
  • 8The Clinical Outeomes of Surgical Therapy Study Group. A comparison of laparoscopieally assisted and open coleetomy for colon cancer[J].N Engl J Med,2004,350(20):2050-2059.
  • 9Lacy AM, Garcia-Valdecasas JC, Delgado S,et al. Laparoscopic assisted colectomy vs. open colectomy for treatment of nonmetastatic colon cancer : a randomized trial [J]. Lancet,2002,359 ( 9325 ) :2224-2229.
  • 10Spivak H, Maele DV, Friedman I, et al. Coloreetal surgery in octogenarians[J]. J Am Coll Surg, 1996,183 (1) :46-50.

共引文献17

同被引文献48

引证文献10

二级引证文献26

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部