基于我国社会信任的交易属性与联盟治理关系实证研究被引量：1

Empirical Researches on the Relationship between Transaction Attributes and Alliance Governance of Alliance——Moderating Effect of Society Trust in China

下载PDF

导出

摘要以信任为调节变量,以联盟结构为中介变量,构建了交易属性(资产专用性)与联盟治理(联盟合同复杂度)之间的概念模型,并运用SPSS 17.0和AMOS 18软件对模型进行了检验分析。研究发现,资产专用性与联盟合同复杂度之间存在显著的正相关关系;资产专用性能够通过联盟结构这一中介变量对联盟合同复杂度产生影响;资产专用性与联盟合同复杂度之间的正相关关系会随着信任的增加而降低;信任对联盟结构与联盟合同复杂度之间以及资产专用性与联盟结构之间的负向调节效应均显著。 This study serves to develop a conceptual model composed of Transaction Attributes（asset specificity） and alliance governance（contractual complexity of alliance（ACC））,using governance structure of alliance（GSA） as a mediator and trust as moderators.By software SPSS17.0 and AMOS18 tests and analyses the conceptual model.Findings of the study show that relationship between asset specificity and ACC are positive,and GSA mediates the relationship between asset specificity and ACC,trust negatively moderates the relationship between asset specificity and ACC,negatively moderates the relationship between asset specificity and GSA,and negatively moderates the relationship between GSA and ACC.

作者赵艳玲龙勇

机构地区重庆大学经济与工商管理学院重庆大学建设管理与房地产学院

出处《管理学报》 CSSCI 北大核心 2013年第5期678-684,共7页 Chinese Journal of Management

基金国家自然科学基金资助项目(71172081) 中央高校基本科研业务费资助项目(CDJSK 100144) 重庆市建设科技计划资助项目(城科字2010第109号)

关键词联盟资产专用性联盟结构联盟合同复杂度信任 alliance asset specificity governance structure of alliance contractual complexity of alliance trust

分类号 C93 [经济管理—管理学]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献29

1DAS T K, TENG B S. Instabilities of Strategic Alli- ances: An Internal Tensions Perspective [J]. Organi- zation Science, 2000, 11(1): 77-101.
2OSBORN R N, BAUGHN C C. Froms of Interorga- nizational Governance for Multinational Alliances[J].Academy of Management Journal, 1990, 33 ( 3 ) : 503-519.
3TEECE D J. Competition, Cooperation and Innova- tion: Organizational Arrangements for Regimes of Rapid Technological Process [J]. Journal of Econom- ic Behavior & Organization, 1992, 18(1): 1--25.
4PARKHE A. Strategic Alliance Structuring: A Game Theoretic and Transaction Cost Examination of Interfirm Cooperation[J]. Academy of Management Journal 1993, 36(4):794-829.
5REUER J J, ARINO A. Strategic Alliance Con- tracts: Dimensions and Determinants of Contractual Complexity [ J ]. Strategic Management Journal, 2007, 28(3): 313-330.
6LUMINEAU F, MALHOTRA D. Shadow of the Contract: How Contract Structure Shapes Interfirm Dispute Resolution [J]. Strategic Management Jour- nal, 2011, 32(5):532--555.
7MARK G. Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness [J]. The American Journal of Sociology, 1985, 91(3) :481-510.
8威廉姆森O.资本主义经济制度[M].王毅才,王伟,译.北京:商务印书馆,1985.
9RING P S, VAN DE VEN A H. Structuring Coop- erative Relationships between Organizations [ J ]. Strategic Management Journal, 1992, 13 (7) : 483-498.
10LUSCH R F, BROWN J R. Interdependency, Con- tracting and Relational Behavior in Marketing Channels [J]. Journal of Marketing, 1996,60(4) : 19-38.