期刊文献+

乳腺癌组织学类型及分级对预测新辅助化疗疗效的价值 被引量:13

The value of tumor histology and grading to predict the response rate to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的:分析乳腺癌不同组织学类型及分级在新辅助化疗疗效预测中的价值。方法:细针穿刺活检确诊的53例乳腺癌病例,给予蒽环类新辅助化疗2周期,化疗前明确组织学类型、分级等临床病理特征,化疗后行乳腺改良根治术并行术后病理检测,评估化疗疗效,分析各临床病理特征与化疗疗效的关系。结果:53例乳腺癌患者新辅助化疗后,病理缓解(包括部分及完全缓解)41例(77.4%),其中病理完全缓解3例(5.7%)。新辅助化疗疗效与组织学类型及分级密切相关(P<0.01),与年龄、是否绝经及原发肿瘤期别均无关(P>0.05)。结论:新辅助化疗疗效仅与组织学类型及分级相关,浸润性导管癌化疗的疗效较非浸润性导管癌疗效佳。组织学分级高者优于分级低者,组织学亚型及级别可作为新辅助化疗敏感病例选择的预测因子。 Objective: To study the role of tumor histology and grading as the predictive factor for the effect of neo- adjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer. Methods: All 53 cases of breast cancer confirmed by core biopsy received neoadjuvant chemotherapy with anthraeycline for two cycles,which were followed by masteetomy. Pathologic response rates were measured after mastectomy. It was analysed statistically that the correlation between cliniclpathology charac- ters and the response rate to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Results:Among all the 53 cases, neoadjuvant chemotherapy achieved clinical response in 77.4% of patients and complete pathologic response in 5.7%. Tumor histology and grade were significant independent prognostic factors but age, menopause, prime tumour grading, tumor histology and grade were not related with prognosis. Conclusion:The response rate to chemotherapy was more significant in patiants with invasive ductal carcinoma of breast than non - invasive ductal carcinoma, with high - grade than low - grade. The study suggested that tumor histology and grading could be playing significant roles in the selection and management of patients with breast cancer for neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
出处 《现代肿瘤医学》 CAS 2013年第1期78-80,共3页 Journal of Modern Oncology
基金 陕西省卫生科研基金项目(编号:2010C12)
关键词 乳腺癌 新辅助化疗 疗效 组织学类型 组织学分级 bresat cancer neoadjuvant chemotherapy effect histology grading
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1Aman U Buzdar. Preoperative clu*mi)llierapy treatment of hreaslcancer - a review [ J]. Cancer,2007,110(11) :2394 - 2403.
  • 2Straver ME, van Adrichem JC, Rutgers FJ ,et al. NeoadjuvaiU sys-temic llierapy in patients with operable primary breast cancer : morebenefits than breast - conserving therapy [ J ]. Ned TijdsclirGeneeskd,2008,152(46) :2519 -2525.
  • 3肖宇,李惠平,侯宽永,赵红梅,王晶,王墨培,曹宝山.40例乳腺癌新辅助化疗的疗效观察[J].癌症进展,2008,6(2):104-109. 被引量:7
  • 4Heitaamer R, Peintinger F, Prokop E, et al. Pathological completeresponse rates comparing 3 versus 6 cycles of epidoxorubirin anddot'elaxel in the neoadjuvanl setting of patients with stage li and IIIbreast cancer [ J ]. Anticant-er I)nigs,2005 ,16(8) :867 - 870.
  • 5Miyoshi Y , Kurosumi M , Kurehayashi J, et al. Low nuclear grati*1hul not cell proliferation predit-tive of pathological complete re-sponse to dwetaxel in human bn^ast cancers [ J ]. J Cancer KesClin ()ncol,2008,134(5) :56l -567.
  • 6Rakha EA, El - Sayed MK, Le AH ,et al. Prognostic significance ofnollingham hislolopc grade in invasive breast ran'inoma [ J ]. JClin Oncol,2008 ,26:3153 -3158.
  • 7Blamev KW, llommark - Stenstam B,Ball G,et al. ONCOPOOI,-A European database* for 16 ,944 cases of breast cancer [ J ]. Kur JCancer,2010,46:56 -71.
  • 8Mook S,Schmidt MK, Rutgers EJ,et al. Calibration and discrimina-tory accuracy of prognosis calculation for lireast cancer with the on-line adjuvant program:a hospital - based retrospective cohort slutJy[J]. I^ncet Oncol,2009,10:1070 -1076.
  • 9Goldhirerh A, Ingle JN ,Gelber KD,et al. Thresholds for therapies:highlights of the St (fallen International Expert Consensus on theprimary therapy of early breast cancer 2009 [J]. Ann Oncol, 2009 ,20:1319-I329.
  • 10Paik S,Shak S,Tang G,et al. A multigene assay to predict recur-rence of tamoxifen - treateMi, nodenegative breasJ canrer [ J ]. NEngl J Med,2004,351 :2817 -2826.

二级参考文献10

  • 1陈灿铭,沈坤炜,柳光宇,吴炅,陆劲松,庄传经,韩企夏,刘邦令,邵志敏,沈镇宙.长春瑞滨和表阿霉素联合新辅助化疗方案治疗局部晚期乳腺癌的临床研究[J].中华外科杂志,2006,44(11):745-747. 被引量:12
  • 2张斌,张强,赵林,龙飞,李爽,姜大庆,徐宏.乳腺癌新辅助化疗疗效的评价及影响因素分析[J].中华肿瘤杂志,2006,28(11):867-870. 被引量:44
  • 3[1]Wolmark N,Wang J,Mamounas E,et al.Preoperative chemotherapy in patients with operable breast cancert Nine-year results from National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project B-18.J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr,2001,30:96
  • 4[2]Jones RL,Smith IE.Neoadjuvant treatment for earlystage breast cancer:Opportunities to assess tumout response.Lancet Oncol,2006,7:869
  • 5[3]Bear HD,Anderson S,Smith RE,et al.Sequential preoperative or postoperative docetaxel added to preoperative doxorubicin plus cyclophosphamide for operable breast cancer:National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Proiect Protocol B-27.J Clin Oncol,2006,24:2019
  • 6[4]Vassilomanolakis M,Koumakis G.,Barbounis V.Firstline chemotherapy with docetaxel and cisplatin in metastatic breast cancer.Breast,2005,14(2):136
  • 7[5]Tulba A,Malik O,Shabana M,et al.Prospective phase Ⅱ study of:neo-adjuvant doxorubicin fohowed sequentially by cisplatin/docetaxel in locally advanced breast cance.Eur J Cancer,2006,4(2):157
  • 8[7]Apple S.K,Suthar F.How do we measure a residual tumor size in Histopathology(the gold standard)after neoadjuvant chemotherapy? Breast,2006,15(3):370
  • 9[8]Ogston KN,Miller ID,Payne S,et al.A new histological grading system to assess response of breast cancers to primary chemotherapy:prognostic significance and Survival.Breast,2003,12:320
  • 10[9]Aman U.Buzdar,MD.Preoperative chemotherapy treatment of breast cancer-a review.Cancer,2007,110:2394

共引文献6

同被引文献71

引证文献13

二级引证文献95

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部