期刊文献+

全球信息公开法评级体系评析:兼论针对中国的评估 被引量:4

Global Right to Information Rating:Concurrently Discussing the Assessment of the Chinese Case
原文传递
导出
摘要 全球信息公开法评级体系在信息公开全球化推广的大背景下应运而生。评级机构期待该评级体系有助于明确各国信息公开法律和国际标准之间的内在差距,并为各国今后信息公开改革运动指明方向。但是,评级体系的固有缺陷,包括主动公开指标的缺乏以及没有兼顾到信息公开法律实施,不利于各国最终提升其透明度,尤其对于我国更是如此。今后评级体系应增加主动公开评估指标,并明确那些直接影响法律实施的指标,在提高其权重的基础上进一步完善。 The global right to information rating was created in the global wave of freedom of information. The rating agencies anticipate that the rating system enable them to pinpoint areas of strength and weakness in the legal framework for guaranteeing the right to informa- tion, and to direct future advocacy at resolving these aspects of weakness. However, the rating system has its drawbacks. It does not in- clude proactive disclosure. Furthermore, it is limited to measuring the legal framework, and does not measure quality of implementation. As a result, it does little help in increasing transparency in a given country, for China in particular. In the future, the rating agencies should include proactive disclosure indicators, and allocate more points to some indicators which have a direct impact on implementation.
作者 肖卫兵
出处 《图书情报工作》 CSSCI 北大核心 2012年第20期74-78,84,共6页 Library and Information Service
基金 上海市浦江人才计划项目"信息流通视野下的信息法研究"(项目编号:12PJC010)研究成果之一
关键词 信息公开 全球信息公开评级体系 全球化 知情权 freedom of information global right to information rating globalization right to know
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1Blanton T. The openness revolution: The rise of a global movementfor freedom of information[ J]. Development Dialogue,2002 (1):7-21.
  • 2Bennett C. Globalisation and access to information regimes [ EB/OL]. [2011 -09 -22]. http://www. atirtf-geai. gc. ca/paper-globalisationl -e. html.
  • 3Promoting practical access to democracy ; A survey of freedom of in-formation in central and eastern Europe [ EB/OL ]. [2011 - 09 -23]. http://www. articlel9. org/pdfs/publications/freedom - of -information - survey - of - central - and - e. pdf.
  • 4Open Society Justice Initiative. Transparency & silence ; A surveyof access to information laws and practices in 14 countries [ EB/OL] ? [2011 -09 - 12]. http://www. soros. org/resources/articles.publications/ publications/ transparency _20060928/transparency _20060928. pdf.
  • 5Center for Law and Democracy, Access Information. Note on theapplication of the RTI rating methodology [ EB/OL]. [2012 -02 -12]. http://rti-rating. org/methodology. html.
  • 6Banisar D. Freedom of information around the World 2006 : A glob-al survey of access to government information laws [ EB/OL ].[2011 -09 - 12]. http://www. freedominfo. org/documents/glob-al_survey2006. pdf.
  • 7Roberts A. Blacked out : Government secrecy in the information age[M]. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2006.
  • 8Xiao Weibing. Freedom of information reform in china: Informationflow analysis [ M]. London: Routledge, 2012.
  • 9肖卫兵.论我国有局限的推出型信息公开法[J].行政法学研究,2010(3):127-135. 被引量:11
  • 10Xiao Weibing. China' s limited push model of FOI legislation[ J].Government Information Quarterly, 2010(3) :346 -351.

共引文献10

同被引文献21

引证文献4

二级引证文献32

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部