期刊文献+

菜豆普通细菌性疫病病原菌鉴定 被引量:10

Identification of Pathogens Causing Common Bacterial Blight on Common Bean(Phaseolus vulgaris L.)
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 【目的】明确中国北方地区菜豆普通细菌性疫病病原菌。【方法】应用菌落特征、油菜黄单胞菌菜豆变种诊断试剂检测、致病性测定、16S rDNA和16S-23S rDNA ITS序列分析、特异PCR检测、脂肪酸分析及生理生化反应特征对病原菌分离物进行鉴定。【结果】从病害样品和菜豆种子样品中均分离到类似黄单胞杆菌的细菌分离物,选取25个代表分离物进行致病性测定,有24个分离物在菜豆品种"英国红"上导致典型菜豆普通细菌性疫病症状。结合16S rDNA及16S-23S rDNA ITS序列比对分析、特异性PCR检测及生理生化反应的结果,24个分离物中7株被鉴定为地毯草黄单胞菌菜豆变种,17株为褐色黄单胞菌褐色亚种。【结论】中国北方地区发生的菜豆普通细菌性疫病由地毯草黄单胞菌菜豆变种或(和)褐色黄单胞菌褐色亚种引起;褐色黄单胞菌褐色亚种在中国属首次报道。 [ Objective] The objective of this study is to identify the pathogens that cause common bacterial blight on common bean in north China. [Method] The causal agents were identified by colony characterization, detection using Xanthomonas campestris pv. phaseoli diagonsis kit (ADGEN EXPRESSTM), pathogenicity test, sequencing 16 rDNA and 16S-23S rDNA intergenic spacer (ITS) regions, PCR detection using specific primers for X. axonopodis pv. phaseoli and X. fuscans subsp, fuscans, fatty acid methyl esters (FAME) analysis and biochemical characterization tests. [ Result ] Bacterial isolates of Xanthmonads-like were isolated from all diseased plant and seed samples. Twenty-five representative isolates were selected for pathogenicity test, and 24 tested isolates casused typical symptoms of common bacterial blight on the inoculated plants of common bean cutivar 'Yingguohong'. Based on pathenogenicity test, and combined with the results of diagonsis kit and specific PCR detection, biochemical and molecular characterization, 7 isoaltes were identifed as X. axonopodis pv. phaseoli, and 17 isolates were identified as X. fuscans subsp, fuscans. [ Conclusion ] The common bacterial blight on common bean in north China was incited by X. axonopodis pv. phaseoli or/and X. fuscans subsp.fuscans. It was the first report ofX.fuscans subsp.fuscans in China.
出处 《中国农业科学》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2012年第13期2618-2627,共10页 Scientia Agricultura Sinica
基金 国家现代农业产业技术体系建设专项资金(CARS-09) 作物种质资源保护项目(NB2010-2130135-25-14)
关键词 菜豆 菜豆普通细菌性疫病 地毯草黄单胞菌菜豆变种 褐色黄单胞菌褐色亚种 common bean common bacterial blight Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. phaseoli X.fuscans subsp.fuscans
  • 相关文献

参考文献36

  • 1Broughton W J, Hemhndez G, Blair M, Beebe S, Gepts P, Vanderleyden J. Beans (Phaseolus spp.) -model food legumes. Plant andSoil, 2003, 252(1): 55-128.
  • 2冯佰利,鱼欢,高小丽,高金峰,柴岩.中国芸豆品牌发展战略研究[J].中国农学通报,2005,21(6):454-457. 被引量:27
  • 3Zapata M, Beaver J S, Porch T G. Dominant gene for common bean resistance to common bacterial blight caused by Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. phaseoli. Euphytica, 2011,179(3): 373-382.
  • 4Biljana T, Svetlana M, Emil R, Ivana P, Milo S. Susceptibility of bean genotypes to Xanthomonas campestris pv. phaseoli in greenhouse conditions. Pesticides and Phytomedicine, 2008, 23: 167-173.
  • 5Mkandawire A B C, Mabagala R B, Guzmm P, Gepts P, Gilbertson RL. Genetic diversity and pathogenic variation of common blight bacteria (Xanthomonas campestris pv. phaseoli and X. campestris pv. phaseoli var. fuscans) suggests pathogen coevolution with the common bean. Phytopathology, 2004, 94(6): 593-603.
  • 6Vauterin L, Hoste B, Kersters K, Swings J. Reclassification of Xanthomonas. International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology, 1995, 45(3): 472-489.
  • 7Schaad N W, Postnikova E, Lacy G H, Sechler A, Agarkova I, Stromberg P E, Stromberg V K, Vidaver A K. Reclassification of Xanthomonas campestris pv. cirri (ex Hasse 1915) Dye 1978 forms A, B/C/D, and E as X. smithii subsp, eitri (ex Hasse) sp. nov. nora. rev. comb. nov., X. fuseans subsp, aurantifolii (ex Gabriel 1989) sp. nov. nom. rev. comb. nov., and X. alfaOhe subsp, c#rumelo (ex Riker and Jones) Gabriel et al., 1989 sp. nov. nora. rev. comb. nov.; X. campestris pv. malvacearum (ex Smith 1901) Dye 1978 as X. smithii subsp, smithii nov. comb. nov. nona. nov.; X. eampestris pv. alfalfae (ex Riker and Jones, 1935) Dye 1978 asX. alfalfae subsp, alfalfae (ex Riker et al., 1935) sp. nov. nora. rev.; and "var. fuscans" of X. eampestris pv. phaseoli (ex Smih, 1987) Dye 1978 as X. fuseans subsp, fuseans sp. nov. Systematic and Applied Microbiology, 2005, 28:494-518.
  • 8Alavi S M, Sanjari S, Durand F, Brin C, Manceau C, Poussier S. Assessment of the genetic diversity of Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. phaseoli and Xanthomonas fuscans subsp, fuscans as a basis to identify putative pathogenicity gen,.'s and a type III secretion system of the SPI-1 family by multiple supgression subtractive hybridizations. Applied and Environmental MicrobJology, 2008, 74(10): 3295-3301.
  • 9Mutlu N, Vidaver A K, Coyne D P, Steadman J R, Lambrecht P A, Reiser J. Differential pathogenicity of Xanthomonas campestris pv. phaseoli and X. fuscans subsp, fuscans strains on bean genotypes with common blight resistance. Plant Di'ease, 2008, 92(4): 546-554.
  • 10Opio A F, Allen D J, Teri J M. Pathogenic variation in Xanthomonas campestris pv. phaseoli, the causal agent of common bacterial blight in Phaseolus beans. Plant Pathology, 1996, 45(6): 1126-1133.

二级参考文献65

  • 1蒋志强,郭坚华.生防菌对土壤微生态影响的风险评估[J].微生物学杂志,2006,26(1):85-88. 被引量:15
  • 2胡开辉,罗庆国,汪世华,林旋,林文雄.化感水稻根际微生物类群及酶活性变化[J].应用生态学报,2006,17(6):1060-1064. 被引量:70
  • 3Trevors J T. Bacterial biodiversity in soil with an emphasis on chemically-contaminated soils. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution, 1998, 101(1): 45-67.
  • 4Wang A, Chen J, Crowley D E. Changes in metabolic and structural diversity of a soil bacterial community in response to cadmium toxicity. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 2004, 39(6): 452-456.
  • 5Fountain M T, Hopkin S P. Biodiversity of collembola in urban soils and the use of Folsomia candida to assess soil 'quality'. Ecotoxicology, 2004, 13(6): 555-572.
  • 6Louda S M, Rand T A, Russell F L, Arnett A E. Assessment of ecological risks in weed biocontrol: input from retrospective ecological analyses. Biological Control, 2005, 35: 253-264.
  • 7Gamalero E, Lingua G, Tombolini R, Avidano L, Pivato B, Berta G. Colonization of tomato root seedling by Pseudomonas fluorescens 92rkG5: spatiotemporal dynamics, localization, organization, viability and culturability. Microbial Ecology, 2005, 50(2): 289-297.
  • 8Roesti D, Gaur R, Johri B N, Imfeld G, Sharma S, Kawaljeet K, Aragno M. Plant growth stage, fertiliser management and bio-inoculation of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and plant growth promoting rhizobacteria affect the rhizobacterial community structure in rain-fed wheat fields. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 2006, 38(5): 1111-1120.
  • 9Meyer J R, Linderman R G. Response of subterranean clover to dual.inoculation with vesicular arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and a plant growth-promoting bacterium, Pseudomonas putida. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 1986, 18(2): 185-190.
  • 10Andrade G, Linderman R G, Bethlenfalvay G J. Bacterial associations with the mycorrhizosphere and hyphosphere of the arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus Glomus mosseae. Plant and Soil, 1998, 202(1):79-87.

共引文献99

同被引文献101

引证文献10

二级引证文献33

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部