期刊文献+

后悔理论视角下的出行选择行为(英文) 被引量:12

Travel choice behavior based on regret theory view
原文传递
导出
摘要 应用随机后悔最小化理论与随机效用最大化理论,分别建立RRM-MNL模型和RUM-MNL模型研究了出行方式选择行为。在模型参数、拟合优度方面对2个模型进行了比较,应用直接弹性分析了在交通管理措施评价方面的区别,并通过城际出行方式中的飞机、火车、长途汽车、小汽车4种出行方式数据进行实际验证。分析结果表明:相比于RUM-MNL模型,RRM-MNL模型能够描述在多属性方案选择过程中的部分补偿性决策行为和折衷效应,能更真实地反映实际出行行为选择过程;等待时间、出行时间和出行费用对飞机、火车和长途汽车3种出行方式的选择概率都具有弹性;在RRM-MNL模型中,等待时间对3种方式的弹性值分别较RUM-MNL模型的低7.30%、13.14%和7.70%。可见,对于同一属性变量,出行者具有不同的选择偏好,会表现出不同的选择行为。 Based on random regret minimization(RRM) theory and random utility maximization (RUM) theory, RRM-MNL model and RUM-MNL model were set up to research the choice behaviors of travel modes respectively. Aiming at RRM-MNL model and RUM MNL model, the parameters and the goodnesses of fit were compared, their difference on the evaluation of traffic management measures was analyzed through direct elasticity, and practical verification was carried out based on four travel data such as aircraft, train, coach and car during intercity travel. Analysis result shows that compared with RUM-MNL model, in RRM-MNL model, the partial compensatory decision-making behavior and compromise effect during the choice process of multi- attribute method are described better, and the choice process of travel behavior can be reflected more really. The choice probabilities of wait time, travel time and travel cost on three travel methods such as aircraft, train and coach have significant elaticities. In RRM-MNL model, the elasticities of wait time for aircraft, train and coach all are lower than those in RUM-MNL model, and reduce by 7.30o//00, 13.14% and 7.70% respectively. So, for the same attribute variable, while the traveler has different choice preferences, the different choice behaviors will be displayed. 4 tabs, 4 figs, 15 refs.
出处 《交通运输工程学报》 EI CSCD 北大核心 2012年第3期67-72,100,共7页 Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering
基金 National Natural Science Foundation of China(51008190,50878129) Research Foundation of Selecting and Training Outstanding Young Teachers in Shanghai Universities(sdj10009) Research Foundation of Shanghai Dianji University(10C201) Key Subject Construction Project of Shanghai Dianji University(10XKJ01)
关键词 交通规划 出行方式 随机后悔最小化 随机效用最大化 部分补偿性决策 折衷效应 直接弹性 traffic planning travel mode random regret minimization random utility maximization partial compensatory decision-making compromise effect direct elasticity
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1ARENTZE T, TIMMERMANS H. Parametric action deci- sion-marking trees: incorporating continuous attribute vari- ables into rule based models of discrete choice[J]. Transpor tation Research Part B, Methodological, 2007, 41 (7): 772-783.
  • 2BELL D E. Regret in decision making under uncertainty[J]. Operations Research, 1982, 30(5): 961 -981.
  • 3ZHANG Jun-yi, TIMMERMANS H, BORGERS A, et al. Modeling traveler choice behavior using the concepts of rela- tive utility and relative interest[J]. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 2004, 38(3): 215-234.
  • 4GILBRIDE T J, ALLENBY G M. A choice model with con- junctive, disjunctive, and compensatory screening rules[J]. Marketing Science, 2004, 23(3): 391-406.
  • 5HESS S, STATHOPOULOS A, DALY A, Mixing of behavior processes: a modeling framework and three case-studies[C]// TRB. 90th Annual Meeting of Transportation Research Board. Washington DC: TRB, 2011: 1-18.
  • 6DENANT-BOEMONT L, PETIOT R. Information value and sequential decision-making in a transport setting: an experi mental study[J]. Transportation Research Part B: Methodo logical, 2003, 37(4): 365-386.
  • 7LEONG W, HENSHER D A. Embedding decision heuristics in discrete choice models: a review[J]. Transport Reviews, 2012, 32(3): 313-331.
  • 8ARENTZE T A, TIMMERMANS H J P. ALBATROSS overview of the model, application and experiences[C]// TRB. Innovation in Travel Modeling 2008. Portland: TRB, 2008 1 -27.
  • 9JOU R C, KITAMURA R, WENG M C, et al. Dynamic commuter departure time choice under uncertainty[J]. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 2008, 42(5) : 774-783.
  • 10HANNES E, JANSSENS D, WETS G. Mental map of daily activity travel routines[C]//TRB. 88th Annual Meeting of Transportation Research Board. Washington DC: TRB, 2009: 1-17.

同被引文献127

  • 1洪永淼,汪寿阳.大数据、机器学习与统计学:挑战与机遇[J].计量经济学报,2021,1(1):17-35. 被引量:98
  • 2任然,靳文舟,巫威眺.基于多属性决策的最优路径选择模型[J].交通信息与安全,2013,31(2):23-26. 被引量:3
  • 3刘伟铭,管丽萍,尹湘源.基于决策树的高速公路事件持续时间预测[J].中国公路学报,2005,18(1):99-103. 被引量:28
  • 4Dreyfus S T.An appraisal of some shortest-path algorithms[J].Operations Research,1959,17(3).
  • 5Hall R.The fastest path through a network with random time-dependent travel time[J].Transportation Science,1986,20(3).
  • 6Kaufman D E,Smith R L.Fastest paths in time-dependent networks for intelligent vehicle highway systems application[J].Journal of Intelligent Transportation Systems,1993,1(1).
  • 7Mirchandani B P.Shortest distance and reliability of probabilistic networks[J].Computer and Operations Research,1976,12(3).
  • 8Fu L,Rilett L R.Expected shortest paths in dynamic and stochastic traffic networks[J].Transportation Research Part B:Methodological,1998,32(7).
  • 9Gallo G,G Longo,S Nguyen,et al.Directed hypergraphs and applications[J].Discrete Applied Mathematics,1993,42(2-3).
  • 10Valentina T,Ioannis K,Michael B,et al.A dynamic route choice model for public transport networks with boarding queues[J].Transportation Planning and Technology,2013,36 (1).

引证文献12

二级引证文献52

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部