4National Cancer Institute. The 1988 Bethesda system for reporting cervical/vaginal cytological diagnoses.JAMA,1989;262 : 931
5Joseph MG, Cragg F, Wright VC, et al. Cytohistological correlates in a colposcopic clinic:a 1-year prospective study. Diagn Cytopathol, 1991 ; 7 : 477
6Kristensen GB, Skyggebjerg KD, Holund B, et al.Analysis of cervical smears obtained within three years of the diagnosis of invasive cervical cancer. Acta Cyto1,1991;35 : 47
7Hutchinson ML, Isenstsin IM, Gnodman A, et al,Homogeneous sampling accounts for the inereased diagnostic accuracy using the Thinprep Processor. Am J Clin Pathol,1994;101 : 215
8Dasey DD, Nielsen ML, Rosenstock W, et al.Tecninology and specimen adequacy in cervicovaginal cytology: the college of american pathologists interlaboratory comparison program experience. Arch Pathol Lab Med,1992;116 : 903
9Dehner LP.Cervicovaginal cytology,falsenegative results and standard of practice.Am J clin Pathol,1993;99:45
10Kurman RJ,Solomon D.The Bethesda system for reporting cervical/vaginal cytological diagnosis.New York:Walsworth Publishing,1994:1～81
9Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Dikshit R,et al. Cancer incidence and mor-tality worldwide : Sources,methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN2012[ J]. International Journal of Cancer,2014,136(5) :E359-E386.
10M Arbyn, J Antoine, M Magi, et al. Trends in cervical cancer incidenceand mortality in the Baltic countries,Bulgaria and Romania [ J ]. Int JCancer,2011,128(8) :1899-1907.
