期刊文献+

冠状动脉造影与三种无创性检查诊断冠心病的对比分析 被引量:59

Comparison of coronary angiography and three kinds of noninvasive methods in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的评价运动心电图试验(EET)、心肌灌注单光子发射计算机断层显像(SPECT)、多巴酚丁胺负荷超声心动图(DSE)对冠心病的诊断价值。方法选择64例冠状动脉造影(CAG)检查的患者,并在同期内(间隔<2周)接受EET、SPECT和DSE检查。将CAG结果分别与EET、SPECT和DSE结果进行对比分析。结果这三种无创性检查诊断冠心病的敏感性分别为:77.1%、94.3%和914%;特异性分别为:72.4%、75.9%和89.6%,准确性分别为:71.9%、85.9%和90.6%。结论DSE对冠心病的诊断具有较高的敏感性和特异性,且费用较低,是一种安全、有效的检查方法。 Objective To investigate the diagnostic value of exercise electrocardiography test (EET), single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) and dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE) in coronary artery disease (CAD).Methods Sixty four patients were examined by coronary angiography (CAG), EET, SPECT and DSE. The duration of all methods was less than two weeks. CAG data were compared with EET, SPECT and DSE.Results The sensitivity in the diagnosis of CAD with EET, SPECT and DSE were 77.1%, 94 3% and 91.4%, respectively. The specificity were 72.4%, 75.9% and 89.6%, respectively. The accuracy rate were 71.9%, 85.9% and 90.6%, respectively.Conclusion In this study, DSE had a higher sensitivity and specificity, reached higher diagnostic accuracy and lower cost. It was a safe and effective methed.
出处 《中华心血管病杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 1999年第2期105-106,共2页 Chinese Journal of Cardiology
关键词 冠心病 冠状动脉造影 心电图 诊断 DSE coronary artery disease coronary angiography eclectrocardiography echocardiography
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

  • 1王利生,张树彬,何萍,祁芸云,李琳.多巴酚丁胺负荷超声心动图试验对冠心病诊断价值的评价[J].中华心血管病杂志,1994,22(3):165-167. 被引量:13
  • 2陈在嘉 徐义枢 等.临床冠心病学[M].北京:人民军医出版社,1992,10..
  • 3刘金耀 松崎益德 等.多巴酚丁胺超声心动图与心肌缺血[J].中国超声医学杂志,1996,12:11-14.
  • 4刘金耀,中国超声医学杂志,1996年,12卷,11页
  • 5王利生,中华心血管病杂志,1994年,22卷,165页
  • 6陈在嘉,临床冠心病学,1994年,108页

二级参考文献2

  • 1王利生,中国现代医学杂志,1993年,3卷,21页
  • 2张树彬,中华心血管病杂志,1990年,18卷,293页

共引文献34

同被引文献176

引证文献59

二级引证文献132

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部