期刊文献+

舞弊审计责任界定标准之博弈分析 被引量:2

Analyzes About Fraud Auditing Responsibility Limits Standard Aspect's Gambling
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 以独立审计机构为中心,深入剖析独立审计机构如何在与社会公众和被审单位双层博弈中,选择最优行为策略。只有了解分析社会公众、独立审计机构和被审单位三者的博弈动态过程,才能找出舞弊的动因(被审单位舞弊以及独立审计机构与被审单位合谋)所在,这也是界定舞弊审计责任的根本。 By establishing the cogame model of the auditees,public and Independent Audit Institutions,the article defines the standards of fraud responsibility and evaluates the reasonableness of present new guidelines.
作者 陈矜
出处 《经济问题》 CSSCI 北大核心 2010年第6期108-111,共4页 On Economic Problems
关键词 舞弊审计责任 博弈 独立审计机构 fraud auditing responsibility game Independent Audit Institutions
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献30

  • 1朱·弗登博格 让·梯若尔.博弈论[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2002..
  • 2罗伯特·吉本斯.博弈论基础[M].北京:中国社会科学出版社,1999..
  • 3沲锡铨.博弈论[M].上海:上海财经大学出版社,2000..
  • 4徐政旦 谢荣 朱荣恩.审计研究前沿[M].上海:上海财经大学出版社,2002..
  • 5Bell, T. B., S. Szykowny, and J. J. Willingham. 1991. Accessing the likelihood of fraudulent reporting: A cascaded logic approach. Working Paper, KPMG Peat Marwiek.
  • 6Boatsman, J.R. ,C. Moeckel, and B. K. W. Pei. 1997. The effects of decision consequences on auditors' reliance on decision aids in audit in audit planning. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 71:211-247.
  • 7Brian Patrick Green. Jae Hwa Choi. 1997. Assessing the risk of management fraud though neural network. Auditing 16- 14-28.
  • 8Calderon, T.G. and B. P. Green. 1994. Analysts' forecasts as exogenous risk indicator in analytical auditing . Advances in Accounting 12:281 - 300.
  • 9Eining, M.M. , D. R. Jones, and J. K. Loebbecke. 1997. Reliance on decision aids: An examination of auditors' assessment of management fraud. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory 16(Fall) : 1 - 19.
  • 10Hackenbrack, K. 1992. Implications of seemingly irrelevant evidence in audit judgment. Journal of Accounting Research(Spring) :54 - 76.

共引文献82

同被引文献8

引证文献2

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部