期刊文献+

中文版人际反应指针量表(IRI-C)的信度及效度研究 被引量:364

Reliability and Validity of the Chinese Version of the Interpersonal Reactivity Index-C
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:分析中文版人际反应指针量表(Interpersonal Reactivity Index-C)信度和效度。方法:采用中文版人际反应指针量表(IRI-C)对529名正常人及365例精神分裂症患者进行评估。结果:信度检验:IRI-C的内部一致性系数为0.750,观点采择(PT)、想象力(FS)、共情性关心(EC)和个人痛苦(PD)因子分别为0.721、0.624、0.532、0.758;分半信度为0.734;重测信度为0.737,PT、FS、EC和PD因子分别为0.700、0.735、0.625、0.655。效度检验:因素分析产生的4个因子共解释46.342%的总方差。各因素具有良好的跨样本一致性和区分度(P<0.001)。结论:中文版人际反应指针量表(IRI-C)具有较好的信度及效度,可用作为共情能力评估工具应用于中国人群。 Objective:To evaluate the reliability and validity of the Interpersonal Reactivity Index-C.Methods:Multiple dimensions of empathy were assessed in 365 schizophrenic patients and 529 healthy subjects with a self-rating instrument,the Interpersonal Reactivity Index-C(IRI-C);and all the 365 schizophrenic patients and 529 healthy subjects were retested by IRI-C.Results:The split half of reliability was 0.734;the Cronbach α-coefficient of IRI-C and the four factors were 0.750,0.721,0.624,0.532,0.758 respectively,the test-retest reliability were 0.737,0.700,0.735,0.625,0.655.IRI-C had four factors which were extracted by factor analysis,and accumulated variance was 46.342%.All of them had significant differentiation validity(P〈0.001).Conclusion:IRI-C has good reliability and validity in application to Chinese people.
出处 《中国临床心理学杂志》 CSSCI CSCD 2010年第2期155-157,共3页 Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology
基金 国家自然科学基金(030670706) 高校省级科学研究项目(KJ2010A165)
关键词 共情 人际反应 信度 效度 因素分析 Empathy Interpersonal reactivity Reliability Validity Factor analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1Thompson E. Empathy and consciousness. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 2001,8(5-7) : 1-32.
  • 2Montg C ,Heinz A,Kunz D,et al. Self-reported empathic abilities in Schizophrenia. Schizophr Res,2007,92 (1-3): 85-89.
  • 3Shamay-Tsoory SG, Shur S, Harari H, et al. Neurocognitive basis of impaired empathy in schizophrenia. Neuropsychology,2007,21(4) :431-438.
  • 4Bora E,Gokcen S,Veznedaroglu B. Empathic abilities in people with schizophrenia. Psychiatry Res,2008,160(1): 23 -29.
  • 5Henry JD, Bailey PE, Rendel PG. Empathy, social functioning and schizotypy. Psychiatry Res, 2008,160(1) : 15-22.
  • 6Davis MH. A multidimensional approach to individual differences in empathy. JSAS Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology, 1980,10 : 85.
  • 7Davis MH. Empathy:A social Psychological Approach. Boulder Westview Press, 1996. 62-81.
  • 8魏源.浙江某高校大学生共情特点分析[J].中国学校卫生,2007,28(2):135-137. 被引量:36
  • 9吕勤.饭店服务人员共情问卷的编制及其共情能力与服务绩效的关系[J].北京第二外国语学院学报,2007,29(5):32-35. 被引量:8
  • 10陈晶,史占彪,张建新.共情概念的演变[J].中国临床心理学杂志,2007,15(6):664-667. 被引量:100

二级参考文献42

  • 1任朝霞.浅谈移情对儿童攻击性行为的影响[J].山东大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2002(4):73-77. 被引量:35
  • 2朱丹,李丹.初中学生道德推理、移情反应、亲社会行为及其相互关系的比较研究[J].心理科学,2005,28(5):1231-1234. 被引量:30
  • 3郑日昌,李占宏.共情研究的历史与现状[J].中国心理卫生杂志,2006,20(4):277-279. 被引量:183
  • 4席春华,汪凯,朱春燕,靳胜春.心理理论的神经基础[J].中国临床心理学杂志,2006,14(4):438-440. 被引量:6
  • 5[1]Berry,L.L.& Parasuraman A.Marketing Services:Competing Through Quality[M].New York:The Free Press.1991.
  • 6[2]Davis,M.H.A multidimensional approach to individual differences in empathy[J].JSAS Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology,1980,10,85.
  • 7[3]Davis,Mark H..Empathy:A Social Psychological Approach[M].Boulder:Westview.1996.
  • 8[4]Zeithaml,V.A.,Berry,L.L.,& Parasuraman,A.The behavioral consequences of service quality[J].Journal of Marketing,1996,60 (2):31~46.
  • 9[5]Parasuraman,A.,Zeithaml,V.A.,Berry.L.L.SERVQUAL:a multiple-item scale for measuring consumer perceptions of service quality[J].Journal of Retailing,1988,64,12~40.
  • 10[6]Parasuramam,A.,Zeithaml,V.A.,Berry.L.L.Alternative scales for measuring service quality:A comparative assessment based on psychometric and diagnostic criteria[J].Journal of Retailing,1994a,70 (3),201 ~230.

共引文献143

同被引文献3166

引证文献364

二级引证文献1969

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部