期刊文献+

斜视儿童智力及注意力的病例对照研究 被引量:2

Case control study,on intelligence and attention of strabismic children
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨斜视对儿童智力及注意力的影响。方法用1:1病例对照研究,对明确诊断为斜视的74名儿童和1:1配比的74名正常对照组儿童进行联合瑞文智力测验和持续操作任务测验。结果1.斜视组儿童持续操作任务测试漏报数标准分[(63.15±15.17)分]高于对照组[(58,26±14.30)分],差异有显著性(t=2.068,P=0.042),平均反应时T分斜视组[(57.42±9.67)分]高于对照组[(53.32±9.77)分],差异有显著性(t=2.819,P=0.006)。2.联合瑞文智力测验显示斜视组儿童智商评分(101.48±11.63)低于对照组(109.25±14.00),差异有显著性(1:3.748,P=0.006)。结论斜视儿童智商评分低于正常儿童、注意力集中程度和警觉性水平存在缺陷。 Objective To study the influence of strabismus to children' s intelligence and attention. Methods With 1:1 case control study,Combined Raven' s Test and Continuous Performance Test were used to assess the intelligence and attention of 74 strabismic children and 74 matched normal children. Results ( 1 ) In Continuous Performance Test,the total number omissions (missed targets) of strabismus group (63.15 ± 15. 17 ) was higher than control group(58.26 ± 14.30) (t = 2. 068, P = 0. 042 ) , the average reaction time of strabismus group(57.42 ± 9.67 ) was longer than control group ( 53.32 ± 9.77 ) (t = 2.819, P = 0. 006 ). ( 2 ) The score of Combined Raven' s Test of strabismus group( 101.48 + 11.63 ) was less than that of control group (109.25 + l g. 00) (t = 3. 748, P = 0. 006). Conclusion The intelligence of strabismus children was less than normal chil- dren. Strabismus children had impairment in the level of attention and vigilance.
出处 《中华行为医学与脑科学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2009年第9期792-793,共2页 Chinese Journal of Behavioral Medicine and Brain Science
基金 基金项目:黑龙江省教育厅基金(1511210),黑龙江省博士后基金(LRB2005-264)
关键词 斜视 注意力 智商 病例对照研究 Strabismus Attention Intelligence Case control study
  • 相关文献

同被引文献20

  • 1Duke-Elder S. Text Book of Ophthalmology. London:Henry Kimpton, 1949:3832-3833.
  • 2Lukman H, Kiat JE, Ganesan A, et al. Strabismus-related prejudice in 5-6-year-old children. Br J Ophthalmol,2010,94(10) :1348-1351.
  • 3Paysse EA, Steele EA, McCreery KM, et al. Age of the emergence of negative attitudes toward strabismus. J AAPOS, 2001,5 ( 6 ) : 361 - 366.
  • 4Packwood EA, Cruz OA, RychWvalski PJ, et al. The psychosocial effects of arnblyopia study. J AAPOS, 1999,3 ( I ) : 15-17.
  • 5Dumian JM, Owen ME, Marsh lB. The psychosocial aspects of" stra- bismus:correlation between the AS-20 and DAS59 quality-of-life questionnaires. J AAPOS ,2009,13 (5) :477-480.
  • 6Satterfield D, Keltner JL, Morrison TL. Psychosocial aspects of stra- bismus study. Arch Ophthalmol, 1993,111 ( 8 ) : 1100-1105.
  • 7Hatt SR, Leske DA, Holmes JM. Comparison of quality-of-life in- struments in childhood intermittent exotropia. J AAPOS, 2010, 14 (3) :221-226.
  • 8Handler S. Evidence shows vision therapy does not benefit children with dyslexia. AAP News,2010,31 (5) : 19.
  • 9Shainberg MJ. Vision therapy and orthoptics. Am Orthopt J ,2010,60 ( 1 ) :28-32.
  • 10Sonksen PM,Levitt S ,Kitsinger M. Identification of constraints acting on motor development in young visually disabled children and princi- ples of remediation. Child Care Health Dev, 1984,10( 5 ) :273-286.

引证文献2

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部