摘要
2007年民事诉讼法再审理由修改的理念支撑是程序正义、细化有助于解决申诉难、再审理由的趋同能够克服申诉难、纠错的理念应彻底抛弃等。新法的实施已经为实证检验立法者立法所依据的假定前提提供了基础。综合实践状况以及理论研究可以看出:实体正义仍需考量并应当作为纠错理念的内容之一,此外应予引入的理念包括:救济当事人的理念和司法效益的理念。据之,新法对再审理由修改的许多做法应予肯定,有些理由需要作限定性解释,有些再审理由应当取消,还应补充进去一些再审理由。
The amendment of retrial causes in Civil Procedure Law promulgated in 2007 is grounded by such ideas as procedural just, segmentation and concretion favorable to ease the difficulty of appeal, the complete disregarding of arguments that the uniformed retrial causes would overcome difficulty of appeal and help rectify the false judgment. The implementation of the new law has offered an empirical foundation to test those presumption ideas. Integrated with practice and theoretical study, it can be concluded that the substantive just is still necessary for rectification of errors, and other ideas should be introduced as well, such as offering remedies to the party concerned and judicial efficiency. Therefore, as for the amendment of retrial causes, achievements should be maintained, some causes should be interpreted with restriction, some excluded and some supplemented.
出处
《北方法学》
2009年第4期76-85,共10页
Northern Legal Science
关键词
民事再审
再审理由
修改
理念
civil retrial
retrial causes
amendment
ideas
