摘要
牟宗三以康德实践理性解说儒学是一错误思路。"心之所同然者何也?谓理也,义也",表明孟子以共通感论述理义来源,"理义之悦我心,犹刍豢之悦我口"两用"悦"字,证明应当以直感判断力解说孟子。分析朱子、阳明的一些言论证明以直感判断力解说儒学则若合符节;并引述康德关于判断力的相关学说、伽达默尔对康德的批评支持上述论点;从而主张,中国道德哲学宜以直感判断力来解释。
This paper points out that Mou Zongsan made a mistake in explaining Confucianism with Kant＇ s practical reason. Mencius once said, “What is it that we agree in common in our minds？ It is the sense of principles and righteousness.” It demonstrates that Mencius discussed the origin of principle and righteousness from common sense. As in “moral principles please our minds as beef, mutton and pork please our mouths,” the word “please” shows that Mencius should be interpreted by aesthetic judgment. Through an analysis of some statements of Zhu Zi and Wang Yangming, this paper upholds that it is advisable to explain Confucianism in the context of aestheric judgment. Relevant studies of Kant on judgment so support the author＇s point that Chinese moral philosophy should be inte and Gadamer＇s criticism on Kant alrpreted by aesthetic judgment.
出处
《复旦学报（社会科学版）》
CSSCI
北大核心
2007年第5期26-38,共13页
Fudan Journal（Social Sciences）
关键词
孟子
儒学
实践理性
直感判断力
Mencius
Confucianism
practical mason
aesthetic judgment
