摘要
文章通过对《广雅疏证》具体例证的分析,认为王念孙已能区分语言义和言语义,但在释义中王念孙仍然依照传统“依文释义”,更重视言语意义。文章分析了《广雅疏证》中“依文释义”的几种常见方式。
This paper, by an analysis of the specific examples quoted in the book Commentaries on ＂Guang Ya＂ （ ＂Guang Ya＂ is a commentary dictionary on Chinese classics edited by Zhang Yi, an ancient Chinese scholar in the 3rd century）, argues that its author Wang Niansun was able to distinguish the meaning of langue and the meaning of parole ; however, in his proofreading commentaries, he still adhered to the traditional principle of ＂context-based defining of word-meaning＂, attaching more importance to the meaning of parole. The paper probes into the several manifestations of the principle observed in the book.
出处
《浙江师范大学学报（社会科学版）》
2006年第2期55-58,共4页
Journal of Zhejiang Normal University(Social Sciences)
关键词
《广雅疏证》
“依文释义”
语言义
言语义
Commentaries on ＂ Langue
Meaning of Parole 58 Guang Ya＂
＂Context-based Defining of Word-meaning＂
Meaning of Langue
Meaning of Parole
