期刊文献+

政治自由及其意义的限度——列宁的理解与启示 被引量:4

Political Freedom and Its Limitation——Linin’s Comprehension and Its Inspiration
原文传递
导出
摘要 Political freedom and its limits is a problem that should be treated strictly.This paper focuses on Lenin’s idea of this problem and tries to reveal the meaning of political freedom and explore the contents of this concept it coves,including freedom of election,speech,press,assembly,incorporation,religion,and so on.Furthermore,it discusses in detail Lenin’s idea of the limits of political freedom.As to Lenin,Political freedom must banish domination of capital or eliminate the phenomena that the minority is rich,but the majority is still poor in society.So the proletarian party should transcend the limits of formal equality between the rich and the poor,and guarantee the exploited laborers enjoying freedom and democracy. Political freedom and its limits is a problem that should be treated strictly.This paper focuses on Lenin’s idea of this problem and tries to reveal the meaning of political freedom and explore the contents of this concept it coves,including freedom of election,speech,press,assembly,incorporation,religion,and so on.Furthermore,it discusses in detail Lenin’s idea of the limits of political freedom.As to Lenin,Political freedom must banish domination of capital or eliminate the phenomena that the minority is rich,but the majority is still poor in society.So the proletarian party should transcend the limits of formal equality between the rich and the poor,and guarantee the exploited laborers enjoying freedom and democracy.
出处 《哲学研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2006年第2期12-18,共7页 Philosophical Research
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

  • 1阿巴拉斯特,安东尼,2004年:《西方自由主义的兴衰》,吉林人民出版社.
  • 2艾德 黄列译.《经济、社会和文化的权利》[M].中国社会科学出版社,2003年版.第176页.
  • 3《国际共产主义运动史文献史料选编》,1985年,中国人民大学出版社.
  • 4《列宁全集》,1986年,人民出版社.
  • 5诺瓦克,曼弗雷德,2003年:《民权公约评注》,三联书店
  • 6萨托利.《民主新论》[M].东方出版社,1998年版.第373页.

同被引文献27

  • 1袁贵仁.全面理解马克思主义的自由观[J].北京师范大学学报(社会科学版),1991(5):33-43. 被引量:7
  • 2李建华,覃青必.论道德自由的三个基本向度[J].哲学研究,2006(1):99-103. 被引量:7
  • 3张传平.尼尔·哈丁的列宁主义观及其批判[J].南京社会科学,2006(4):29-34. 被引量:2
  • 4[法]托克维尔.论美国的民主[M].董果良译,北京:商务印书馆2009年版.
  • 5马克思,恩格斯.马克思恩格斯文集(第9卷)[M].北京:人民出版社,2009.
  • 6[法]雷蒙·阿隆.论自由[M].上海:上海译文出版社,2009.
  • 7崇明.托克维尔:民主的政治科学[M].上海:上海三联书店,2006:112.
  • 8F. H. Knight. Freedom and Reform [ M ]. New York, 1947 : 193.
  • 9G. Neckel. Adel Und Gefolgschaft [ M]. Beitrage Zur Ge- schichte derdeutschen Sprache Und Literature, XLI. 1916:403.
  • 10[英]以赛亚·伯林.自由论[M].胡传胜译.南京:译林出版社,2011.

引证文献4

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部